Skip to main content

MySQL Master to Master Replication with AUTO_INCREMENT

Master-to-master replication:

MySQL offers parameters auto_increment_increment, and auto_increment_offset for master to master replication. Most of the time folks believe when we set auto_increment_offset to odd no., such as 1 for server 1(Master 1),  and even no. such as 2, for server 2 (Master 2), we are all set. But according to Oracle these two parameter  "can be used to control the operation of AUTO_INCREMENT columns." Means columns which are not using AUTO_INCREMENT for primary key, master to master replication could break at some point, and require human intervention.
Default is 1 for these two parameters. Ref. https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/replication-options-master.html

For auto_increment_increment - 10, and auto_increment_offset

 auto_increment_increment:
This parameter controls the interval between successive column values. Use of auto_increment_increment in table definition - col_name INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY. When you SET @@auto_increment_increment=10, then each row will have value 1, 11, 21, 31 etc.
auto_increment_offset:This parameter determines the starting point for the AUTO_INCREMENT column value.
Use of auto_increment_offset in table definition - col_name INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY. When you SET @@auto_increment_offset=5, then each row will have value 5,15,25,35 etc.
Note: When the value of auto_increment_offset is greater than that of auto_increment_increment, the value of auto_increment_offset is ignored.

In ideal situation application logic, policies and procedures needs to be protected in such a way that says "if you want to modify row on Master1, do so on Master2 also" and that needs to exist for every row or object in every table to keep continue Master to Master replication, otherwise use certification based replication such as Galera, Group Replication, or InnoDB cluster, which can handle split brain, automatic fail over, and some other issues.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MySQL InnoDB cluster troubleshooting | commands

Cluster Validation: select * from performance_schema.replication_group_members; All members should be online. select instance_name, mysql_server_uuid, addresses from  mysql_innodb_cluster_metadata.instances; All instances should return same value for mysql_server_uuid SELECT @@GTID_EXECUTED; All nodes should return same value Frequently use commands: mysql> SET SQL_LOG_BIN = 0;  mysql> stop group_replication; mysql> set global super_read_only=0; mysql> drop database mysql_innodb_cluster_metadata; mysql> RESET MASTER; mysql> RESET SLAVE ALL; JS > var cluster = dba.getCluster() JS > var cluster = dba.getCluster("<Cluster_name>") JS > var cluster = dba.createCluster('name') JS > cluster.removeInstance('root@<IP_Address>:<Port_No>',{force: true}) JS > cluster.addInstance('root@<IP add>,:<port>') JS > cluster.addInstance('root@ <IP add>,:<port> ') JS > dba.getC...

Amazon RDS | Amzon Redshift | Big Data | Boost Performance with Amazon ElastiCache

Amazon RDS with Amazon ElastiCache for Performance: Amazon RDS supports - Oracle, MS SQL server, MySQL, Maria DB and PostgreSQL. It is a managed service offered by the Amazon.  Couple of customers have observed the performance issues during their journey with Amazon RDS with Oracle, MS SQL Server, MySQL, Maria DB and PostgreSQL. Amazon cloud engineers / database consultants / database architect and Amazon supports worked to-gather to boost the Amazon RDS performance by tuning the RDBMS configuration parameters using Amazon RDS parameter group , and have not achieved the SLA for Amazon RDS .  Amazon RDS with Multi AZ and Read Replica: Some of the the AWS professionals have suggested for vertical scaling of the Amazon RDS . It should works and its absolutely correct. In my opinion, it would be a good idea to think about the Amazon ElastiCache service with Amazon RDS for better performance and cost optimization also rather than vertically scaling the Amazon RDS . I would sug...

Needs for Graph Database

Needs for Graph Database: We are living in the era of data, data is treated more precise than gold and platinum. Most of the enterprises are trying to get more insight about the data they have it as an operational / warehouse / analytical.   Ref.: https://dist.neo4j.com/wp-content/uploads/graph-example.png To get more insight into the data, it is required to see the relationship among the data points. The challenge is how to establish the relationship among data points and the answers is Graph database. Relational databases can't help to establish the relationship among data points, due to their rigid schema, and consistent schema. Relational Database issues for data set: Number of Joins:  While fetching data from relational databases, we join many tables, these joins are complex, and consume considerable amount of computing resources, which increase the query response times. Self- joins: For database ware house / business intelligence systems using RDBMS, self-JOIN are ...